FI
Fermi Inc. (FRMI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Pre-revenue quarter with substantial execution milestones: executed a $150M Advance in Aid of Construction (AIAC) with Tenant 1, advanced permits and site work, secured/LOI’d ~2.2 GW of gas-fired capacity, and completed a ~$785M IPO (dual-list NASDAQ/LSE) to fund Phase 1 of Project Matador .
- Management reiterated first 1 GW of power targeted by end-2026; CFO said revenue begins in 2026 in prepared remarks, while Q&A referenced being “on plan” for revenue and income in 2027 per S-1—timeline largely maintained with a noted ~3-week slippage in the LOI-to-lease conversion process for Tenant 1, which management aims to claw back in November .
- Q3 GAAP net loss was $346.8M (or $(0.84) per share) driven by significant non-cash items including a $173.4M donation and fair value/derivative marks; cash and equivalents were $183.0M at quarter-end (incl. $99.3M restricted) ahead of IPO proceeds in October .
- Street consensus (S&P Global) for revenue/EPS was unavailable via our tool mapping—no formal beat/miss can be assessed; we note an analyst on the call cited “price weakness” tied to perceived delay in LOI conversion, which management framed as timing (not plan) slippage .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Commercial progress: $150M AIAC with Tenant 1, aligning cost reimbursement/prepayments and reinforcing commitment ahead of the long-term campus lease .
- Capacity and supply-chain positioning: ~2.2 GW gas-fired generation secured/under LOI (incl. nine industrial turbines, SPS/Excel commitments, mobile TM2500s) and LOI for 1.1 GW Siemens F-class for 2026 delivery; dedicated gas (~300k MMBtu/d) and water agreements in place .
- Permitting/regulatory: NRC accepted COL application for 4 AP1000s; TCEQ preliminarily approved 6 GW Clean Air Permit (public comment underway), enabling synchronized progression of permits and long-lead equipment .
- Quote: “One gigawatt of gross capacity is expected to generate approximately $1.5 billion of annualized revenue and about $1 billion of net operating income” (CFO) .
What Went Wrong
- Timing slip on LOI-to-lease conversion: Management cited roughly a three-week delay vs internal expectations (pushing December target), though emphasized plan remains intact and work is focused on resolving “the five big ones” up front .
- Safety program behind schedule: Investor materials flag safety program status as “Behind Schedule” (while other workstreams remain on/on-ahead of schedule), indicating operational execution risk to be monitored .
- Measurement discrepancy on TM2500 capacity: Press release cites 157.5 MW nameplate (7 units), while management commentary referenced ~135 MW of flexible capacity—implies nameplate vs expected operating contribution delta; investors should focus on operable MW and timing .
Financial Results
Income statement and cash metrics (company is pre-revenue; no prior-year public comparables):
Balance sheet snapshot:
Operating and development KPIs:
Note: S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 revenue/EPS was unavailable via our mapping; no estimate comparison presented .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: Earlier quarters not publicly available; Q3 is the company’s first public earnings cycle .
Management Commentary
- Business model economics: “One gigawatt…is expected to generate approximately $1.5 billion of annualized revenue and about $1 billion of net operating income” (CFO) .
- Tenant 1 commitment: “The $150 million is clearly a sign of good faith and commitment…an indication they’re vested in getting that lease accomplished” (CFO) .
- Grid strategy: “Everyone gets that the power is going to come behind the meter…Fermi sits in… the best site to produce behind-the-meter at scale” (CEO) .
- Nuclear ambition: “We intend to be first. Period. End stop. First reactors in the United States for the nuclear renaissance” (CEO) .
- Execution tone: “We have not slipped on our power delivery…This three-week delay on the tenant discussion is just that” (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Tenant 1 lease/AIAC: $150M AIAC viewed as “promises kept” and strong commitment; lease signing slipped ~3 weeks vs target, with management prioritizing toughest issues first to accelerate closure .
- Demand outlook and tenant pipeline: Active discussions with ~half a dozen potential tenants; customers increasingly seek larger footprints; expectation to have commitments for full 11 GW within ~2 years .
- Supply chain risk management: Long-lead items secured; heightened focus on safeguarding procured components and coordinating multiple contractors; ongoing “paranoid” stance to mitigate risks .
- Power mix and infrastructure: 1.1 GW F-class LOI timed for 2026; BESS intensity likely higher than initial assumptions at Tenant 1’s request; gas pipeline trenching underway; 300 mmcf/d supports ~2.2–2.5 GW .
- Policy tailwinds: U.S. agencies aided Siemens F-class allocation; broader federal/state support referenced as helpful to “jump the line” on equipment .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 revenue and EPS was unavailable via our data tool mapping; as such, no numeric beat/miss assessment versus Street is presented .
- Given pre-revenue status and heavy non-cash items in Q3, we expect estimate revisions (where they exist) to focus on: (i) timing of Tenant 1 lease execution, (ii) revenue commencement 2026 vs 2027 language reconciliation, and (iii) capital intensity and BESS sizing (tenant-driven) .
Guidance Changes
(See table above for specific metrics; key directional updates)
- Timeline: First 1 GW by end-2026 maintained; Tenant 1 lease targeted for early December with ~3-week delay acknowledged .
- Economics: Per-gigawatt lease model reiterated ($1.5B annualized revenue, ~$1.0B NOI) .
- Storage mix: BESS intensity likely higher than initial plan given tenant preferences .
- Nuclear: FEED advancing with Hyundai; forging readiness with Doosan; COLA accepted by NRC .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Commercialization de-risking: The $150M AIAC materially validates Tenant 1 and should ease near-term project finance negotiations; watch for lease signing as the next catalyst .
- Timeline steady despite admin slippage: Management aims to recover ~3 weeks on Tenant 1; power delivery targets remain intact—monitor December lease execution and early-2026 gas/water infrastructure milestones .
- Capacity runway expanding: ~2.2 GW secured/LOI with 1.1 GW Siemens F-class slotted for 2026, plus pipeline/water/permit progress positions FRMI for first 1 GW by end-2026 and multi-GW scale-up thereafter .
- Nuclear optionality: Hyundai/Doosan agreements and NRC acceptance provide credible baseload path; successful FEED and component procurement in 2026 could re-rate execution risk .
- Risk monitor: Safety program flagged as behind schedule; supply chain custody/coordination and TM2500 contribution vs nameplate need continued scrutiny .
- Stock drivers near term: (i) Tenant 1 lease signing; (ii) additional tenant LOIs; (iii) evidence of on-time long-lead deliveries/site work; (iv) clarity on 2026 revenue commencement vs 2027 wording .
- Medium-term thesis: If FRMI executes first 1–2 GW on-time with lease economics approximating $1.5B per GW revenue and ~$1B NOI, the embedded earnings power scales rapidly—tenancy/financing cadence and capex discipline are key .
Citations:
- Earnings call transcript: –, –
- 8-K with Shareholder Letter/Investor Presentation: –
- Press releases (Nov 4–10, Oct 29–30): – – – – –